True or False: A board may cite or fine a currently licensed practitioner for being in default on a Department of HHS education loan.

A board may indeed cite or fine a currently licensed practitioner for being in default on a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) education loan because such defaults can be seen as a violation of professional obligations and responsibilities. In California, the law requires that licensed professionals adhere to specific ethical and financial standards, including the management of educational loans. When a practitioner defaults on these loans, it can indicate a lack of financial responsibility, which is relevant to their professional conduct.

In this context, the board has the authority to ensure that all members of the profession maintain a certain level of accountability, and financial irresponsibility can undermine public trust in the profession. Therefore, being in default on such loans can lead to disciplinary action.

The distinction here is that this rule applies universally to licensed practitioners within the state, not restricted by specific circumstances unless stated otherwise in detailed regulations or policies. Thus, the assertion that the board has the power to take action in the event of a default is indeed true.